Data is only as good as the life it was collected in.
The evidence we have, told in full. Studies, certifications and field results.
Johns Hopkins University · Journal of Medical Systems, 2024
Thirty patients, twenty-four hours, a head-to-head comparison with the Holter.
[Five or six lines faithful to the full text of the study: what was done, how, with what results. To be written from the full text.]
heart-rate agreement
of the time with adequate signal
ComfortHolterAccyourate
Adhesive electrodes on the skin
Visible cables
Washable and reusable
Worn under everyday clothes
Weeks of monitoring
Comfort rated clearly superior to the Holter.From the comfort questionnaire completed by the study participants.
ConclusionThe quality of the garment’s single-lead ECG signal is comparable to that of a Holter.
ConclusionThe system has potential as a long-term monitoring tool, thanks to its high comfort and its ability to capture the main features of the ECG.
A CE-marked medical device.
Wearable medical device intended for ECG monitoring applications.
The best evidence is the evidence you collect.
A pilot in your context, with clear goals and results read together.